Chiara Tincani decree; precisely because the latter regulates wine routes, it must select how many (there must be at least two) and which organizations can promote their creation. On the contrary, for wine tourism it is enough for the activity to be carried out by an agricultural entrepreneur, and this conclusion is inherent in the very definition of wine tourism as an expression of the multi - functionality of the farm. There is no reason to change the approach. Article 2, fourth paragraph, conditions the exercise of wine tourism on the notification of the start of the activity, but this principle is also enshrined in Law No. 205 of 2017. Article 2, fifth paragraph, of the bill imposes an administrative fine on anyone who exercises without having submitted the aforementioned report and authorizes the municipality to inhibit the activity in the twelve months following the establishment of the violation. Overall, these clarifications do not alter the existing regulatory framework. Moreover, in line with Law No. 205 of 2017, Article 2, seventh paragraph, refers the definition of the expected quality criteria to a ministerial decree. A new element is provided in Article 2, third paragraph, of the bill, according to which "the person in charge of wine tourism activities must hold the qualification of sommelier". The provision seems excessive and at odds with the desire to encourage the development of these initiatives; if these requirements were to be confirmed, they could be expected to shrink. For them to act as a stimulus for an expansion of agricultural activity and its qualification, they must be organized with a simplified procedure. Then, Article 3 entrusts the regions with the organization of training, retraining and professional development courses, but this is in continuity with the 2019 ministerial decree and no innovative insights emerge. Finally, Article 5 regulates the control functions assigned to
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE4NzM5Nw==