is the fundamental theme around which both primary and multilevel legislation and, more generally, all the soft law of reference with the subject will be refined in the coming years. Suffice it to say in this regard that the United Nations agency that deals specifically with the coordination of tourism policies promoting sustainable and responsible development (UNWTO) has long emphasized the close interconnection between tourism practice and the place in which it is prioritized (the city), recognizing tourism as a driving force also in the pursuit of the goals of Agenda 2030 and in particular Goal 11, which will be to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. 66 This will imply the need to adopt good stewardship practices such as to instill a different cultural posture even on the part of those momentary citizens who are tourists so that everyone can in the sign of such good practices manifest awareness toward the major problems of overtourism, scarcity of primary resources, starting with water, climate change, and the fragility of cultural heritage in general.67 With respect to these needs, we thought of devising elsewhere the neologism of the surbeuomo68 , that is, of an up-to-date administrator of public policy and the city who knows, in particular, how to surf the waves of the complexities existing in our societies today without flag stiffening, but with due cultural depth and with the decision-making and management elasticity69 from time to time required by the often polymorphous nature of the goods emerging from the contemporary.70 report “An action strategy for sustainable tourism development,” seven principles for promoting sustainable tourism are outlined. These principles relate to: 1) limiting on a global and local scale the impact produced by human activities on ecosystems, respecting their carrying capacities; 2) conserving the stock of natural resources in the area; 3) minimizing the exploitation of nonrenewable resources; 4) promoting long-term economic development, which increases the benefits that can be derived from a given stock of resources; 5) to achieve equitable distribution of the benefits and costs of natural resource management; 6) to achieve effective participation of local communities and interest groups in decisions that directly affect them; 7) to promote those values that are an encouragement to others in the pursuit of sustainable development. 66 On the funding provided to tourism and these objectives see M. Bozzaotre, EU funding for the tourism sector, in Tourism Law, no. 1/2006. European Commission, Guide to EU funding for the tourism sector (2014-2020) 2016. 67 For a thoughtful reflection on all these aspects and the possible solutions to be put in place, see C. Del Bo, M. Filoni, G. Labriola, Politics of the City, ETS 2020. 68 Cf., L. Cameriero, Three inescapable strategies to serve smart cities. About public-private collaboration in city policies, intelligent customer use of public contracts and environmental neutrality, in Innovation and sustainability for the future of smart cities by G.F. Ferrari, (ed.), Mimesis 2023. 69 On the implications of this horizon never ceases to instruct F.G. Scoca, Authority and Consent, in Dir. Amm., fasc. 3, 2002. See also for a more general neo-urbanistic perspective, M. Carta, Homo urbanus. Evolving cities and communities, Donzelli 2022. 70 In the groove of this postural background see, also for further references, the valuable observations, rich in implications by A. Police (ed.), I beni pubblici: tutela, valorizzazione e gestione, Milano, 2008; L. Giani, Destinazione 182 FRANCESCO GASPARI | LUIGI CAMERIERO
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE4NzM5Nw==