VIII. HEURISTICS OF GOOD ADMINISTRATION As we have had the opportunity to see, already for many years somewhat all administrations of cities with a tourist vocation have been looking for solutions to prevent tourism from being transformed from an economic opportunity tout court into only a relative opportunity in the face of the many problems that at the same time it generates on the environment and urban planning in general. Under this specific angle of view, the idea of smart cities is connoted with a particular iridescence in the face of the various technologies it promises to encompass in the construction, reconstruction or regeneration of the cities of the future. And indeed, if administrations wisely balance the offerings that the new technological frontier makes available to them in the reformulation of broadly understood urban and territorial arrangements, there no reason not to believe that smart cities themselves will certainly be one of the best opportunities to control that tourist degradation that very often deeply undermines the ecosystem in which they are embedded. Policy has seized opportunities from technologies to improve critical aspects affecting the delicate relationship between residents and tourists. To this end, one of the most praiseworthy practices of good administration of tourist flows is delivered to us by the City of Venice through the detourism project to which the city itself has given impetus and which ultimately consists of uncovering the most unknown and equally valiant new itineraries toward which to direct tourists. The project, which should be taken as a cue by all administrations, consists, therefore, of giving visibility, primarily, to unfamiliar places in a city, that is, those places that for one reason or another have not become precisely places in the tourist mainstream. The promotion of this true form of evaluation of the interests at stake that we would like to call of tourism orthopedics allows, therefore, the administrations to favor, thanks to the use of those appropriate technologies that already inhabit the new city, and of a territorially responsible rather than economically ravenous planning, a positive impact on the territory and the landscape of reference that knows at the same time how to decongest the center and enhance the peripheral areas. This is an invitation to a real paradigm shift on the part of administrations77 which, in our opinion, in the face of the environmental emergencies of the 77 For this change of the optical summit, the disinterested comparison with F. Capra, U. Mattei, Ecology of Law, Aboca 2017 comes in handy 186 FRANCESCO GASPARI | LUIGI CAMERIERO
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE4NzM5Nw==